Journal of Medical Council of Iran
Volume 44, Issue 3 (2026)
jmciri 2026, 44(3): 75-78 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: نامه به سردبیر
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zaare Nahandi M, Zaare Nahandi M. The Need for Continuous Education in Medical Documentation in Teaching Hospitals: The Role of an Education–Assessment–Feedback Cycle. jmciri 2026; 44 (3) :75-78
URL: http://jmciri.ir/article-1-3439-en.html
URL: http://jmciri.ir/article-1-3439-en.html
Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (20 Views)
Abstract
The quality of medical documentation is a fundamental component of patient safety, effective clinical education, continuity of care, and physicians’ professional accountability. Despite its recognized importance, evidence indicates that medical documentation in many teaching hospitals continues to exhibit substantial structural and qualitative deficiencies. Such shortcomings may adversely affect clinical decision-making, the quality of medical education, communication among healthcare professionals, and even medicolegal outcomes. Furthermore, in many medical curricula, documentation training is largely limited to introductory sessions or written guidelines and is rarely accompanied by continuous performance assessment and structured feedback, thereby limiting its educational effectiveness.
This letter aims to highlight the need for a paradigm shift in the way medical documentation is taught from isolated educational interventions to a longitudinal, competency-based process supported by continuous assessment and regular feedback. It also describes the experience of implementing a quality improvement initiative over more than a decade in a teaching hospital in northwestern Iran, together with the challenges encountered during its implementation. The program was developed in response to recurring deficiencies in clinical documentation and was built around an integrated education–assessment–feedback cycle. This experience suggests that integrating structured education with continuous monitoring of documentation quality and systematic feedback to students, faculty members, and academic departments can improve the accuracy, consistency, and standardization of medical documentation while strengthening educational supervision and fostering a professional culture of clinical documentation. Although formal evaluation of this approach in other settings is still needed, this experience may provide a practical framework for developing similar educational initiatives in other teaching hospitals.
The quality of medical documentation is a fundamental component of patient safety, effective clinical education, continuity of care, and physicians’ professional accountability. Despite its recognized importance, evidence indicates that medical documentation in many teaching hospitals continues to exhibit substantial structural and qualitative deficiencies. Such shortcomings may adversely affect clinical decision-making, the quality of medical education, communication among healthcare professionals, and even medicolegal outcomes. Furthermore, in many medical curricula, documentation training is largely limited to introductory sessions or written guidelines and is rarely accompanied by continuous performance assessment and structured feedback, thereby limiting its educational effectiveness.
This letter aims to highlight the need for a paradigm shift in the way medical documentation is taught from isolated educational interventions to a longitudinal, competency-based process supported by continuous assessment and regular feedback. It also describes the experience of implementing a quality improvement initiative over more than a decade in a teaching hospital in northwestern Iran, together with the challenges encountered during its implementation. The program was developed in response to recurring deficiencies in clinical documentation and was built around an integrated education–assessment–feedback cycle. This experience suggests that integrating structured education with continuous monitoring of documentation quality and systematic feedback to students, faculty members, and academic departments can improve the accuracy, consistency, and standardization of medical documentation while strengthening educational supervision and fostering a professional culture of clinical documentation. Although formal evaluation of this approach in other settings is still needed, this experience may provide a practical framework for developing similar educational initiatives in other teaching hospitals.
Type of Study: Letter to Editor |
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |